(1) 1966MmRAS.134..189Kenderdine,Ryle&Pooley
(2) 1968MmRAS.139..529Pooley & Kenderdine
(3) 1969MNRAS.144..101Pooley
(4) 1970MNRAS.151....1Willson
(5) 1975MNRAS.171..475Pearson
(6) 1978MNRAS.182..273Pearson & Kus
(7) 1978MNRAS.182..273Pearson & Kus
(8) 1984MNRAS.211..433Green
(9) 1977MNRAS.181..547Wagget
(10) 1981MNRAS.196..695Schuch
(12) 1982MNRAS.200..747Benn+
(13) 1995MNRAS.272..699Benn
(14) 1991MNRAS.251..253Benn & Kenderdine
(15) 1991MNRAS.251..253Benn & Kenderdine
(16) 1991MNRAS.251..253Benn & Kenderdine
The flux densities adopted are given in Macdonald et al 1968, MNRAS 138, 259, see table on p. 262.
Branson's survey described in his 1967 paper has been looked at again in connection with the 6C survey with a view to making 81--151 MHz comparisons; in particular, the maps were reworked by Waggett in an attempt to improve the synthesized beam-shape. The conclusion he came to, from the 3C sources in the field, is that the flux density scale was approximately on the scale of Kellermann et al 1969 (ApJ 157,1) but it was not consistent over the whole field, almost certainly because the envelope correction factor had not been known well enough.
This is I think about as far as we can go. Inevitably in earlier observations with an instrument, there are corrections due to instrumental and other effects which are not as well understood as they subsequently become.
My notes for the correction factors of 5C survey fluxes to the Baars
scale as follows:
5C1 1.06 (from Kenderdine's letter, assuming KPW scale)
5C2 0.77 (Gillespie 1979, MNRAS)
5C3 1.06 (Gillespie 1979, MNRAS)
5C4 1.06 (Gillespie 1979, MNRAS)
5C5 1.06 (Gillespie 1979, MNRAS)
For the OMT, at 408 MHz, T_n is 160 K (Pearson, 1975), so the difference in the correction factors between these observations and the calibtator fields is ~0.83, and all flux densities in this paper have been adjusted to allow for this. Details of the 26 sources remoted are given in Table 2. The appendix to this gives details of 163 sources detected by this survey.
Source counts are presented and confirm the results from previous 5C surveys. Spectral index distributions are constructed for samples of sources selected at 408 and 1407 MHz and compared with results for samples selected at higher flux densities. There is no evidence for any change in the distributions over a 10^3 range in flux density.
Map center (1950): 12h58m43s 35o14'00" 408 MHz 1407 MHz Area 5.12x8.91 1.28x2.23^o. beam 80"x80"cosec(dec) 23"x23cosec(dec) rms 2.8 mJy 0.31mJy flux limit 9.0 mJy 1.4 mJy Calibrators 3C48 35.0 Jy 15.8 Jy 3C147 42.0 Jy 22.2 Jy 3C295 54.0 Jy 22.7 Jy
Suggested Bytes Units Format Item 1- 4 A4 Source name 7- 8 hour I2 Right ascension (B1950) 10-11 min I2 Right ascension (B1950) 13-16 sec F4.1 Right ascension (B1950) 20-22 deg I3 Declination (B1950) 24-25 arcmin I2 Declination (B1950) 27-30 arcsec F4.1 Declination (B1950) 32-35 arcsec F4.1 Err-ra-408 38-41 mJy I4 S408 43-46 mJy I4 Err-408 49-53 F5.3 Att-408 56-60 arcsec F5.1 Diff-ra 62-66 arcsec F5.1 Diff-dec 69-71 arcsec F3.1 Err-ra-1407 74-78 mJy F5.1 S1407 80-84 mJy F5.1 Err-1407 87-91 F5.3 Att-1407 94-98 F5.2 Alpha
Right ascension, declination: The coordinates have been corrected for precession to epoch B1950.0 measured at 408 MHz or, if detected at the higher frequency only, at 1407 MHz. The positions are weighted means of those measured from the 5C12 and 5C14 + 15 + 16 maps.
Err-ra-408: Rms uncertainty in the 408 MHz right ascension. The uncertainty in declination is larger by a factor cosec (declination), approximately 1.74 at the 5C12 map center.
S408, Err-408: Peak 408 MHz flux density and rms uncertainty, measured from the 5C14 + 5C15 + 5C16 combined map. Flux densities are on the scale of Kellermann et al. (1969); to bring them on to the scale of Baars et al. (1977), they should be multiplied by 1.07 (Riley 1988).
Att-408: Effective envelope attenuation P_eff at 408 MHz. S408 must be multiplied by this factor to recover the apparent flux density S' with which the source appears on the 5C14 + 5C15 + 5C16 map, and hence the signal-to-noise ratio.
Diff-ra, Diff-dec: Difference between 408 MHz and 1407 MHz positions in the sense 1407-408 MHz. The 1407 MHz position was measured from whichever of the 5C12, 5C14, 5C15, or 5C16 maps gave the highest signal-to-noise ratio.
Err-ra-1407: Rms uncertainty in 1407 MHz right ascension. The uncertainty in declination is larger by a factor cosec (declination).
S1407, Err-1407: Peak 1407 MHz flux density and uncertainty. The flux density was measured from whichever of the 5C12, 5C14, 5C15, or 5C16 maps gave the highest signal-to-noise ratio. Flux densities are on the scale of Kellermann et al. (1969); to bring them on to the scale of Baars et al. (1977), they should be multiplied by 1.04.
Att-1407: Envelope attenuation P at 1407 MHz.
Alpha: Radio spectral index between 408 and 1407 MHz, defined by S_nu ~nu^(alpha).
The "alpha" or spectral index column differed in sign between the published version of this catalog and the electronic version submitted to the ADC. Apparently the absolute value of the column was the same in the two versions, only the sign was affected. The electronic version was modified by the ADC to agree with the printed catalog.
The declination (seconds) column contained a mix of I2 and F4.1 format numbers in the electronic version submitted to the ADC. A decimal point was added to the I2 format numbers (byte number 29) by the ADC so the entire column could be read with an F4.1 format. No change was made to the data values themselves.
Benn, C. R., Grueff, G., Vigotti, M., and Wall, J. V. 1982, MNRAS, 200, 747
Benn, C. R., Grueff, G., Vigotti, M., and Wall, J. V. 1988, MNRAS, 230, 1
Benn, C. R. and Kenderdine, S. 1991, MNRAS, 251, 253
Kellermann, K. I., Pauliny-Toth, I. I. K., and Williams, P. J. S. 1969, ApJ, 157, 1
Riley, J. M. 1988, MNRAS, 233, 225
J/MNRAS/272/699 The 5C13 deep radio survey (Benn+, 1995) ========================================================================== The 5C13 deep radio survey (16h, +42) BENN C.R.=1995MNRAS.272..699B (SIMBAD/NED Reference) ============================================================================ Keywords: surveys - radio continuum: general Description: A deep 0.4-GHz survey of a 4deg-diameter region in Hercules is reported. 232 sources brighter than 9.5 mJy were detected. In a simultaneous 1.4-GHz survey of the concentric area 1deg in diameter, 45 sources brighter than 1.7 mJy were detected. The differential 0.4-GHz radio source count is presented; it is in good agreement with that from other 5C surveys. This survey brings to 3220 the number of 0.4-GHz sources catalogued by the published 5C surveys. File Summary: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- FileName Lrecl Records Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ReadMe 80 . This file table1 98 254 The 5C13 catalogue table2 64 11 5C13 0.4-GHz source counts ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1- 4 A4 --- 5C13 5C13 serial number 6- 7 I2 h RAh Right ascension (1950) (1) 9- 10 I2 min RAm Right ascension (1950) (1) 12- 16 F5.2 s RAs Right ascension (1950) (1) 19- 20 I2 deg DEd Declination (1950) 22- 23 I2 arcmin DEm Declination (1950) 25- 28 F4.1 arcsec DEs Declination (1950) 31- 33 F3.1 arcsec e_RA rms uncertainty in measured RA 36- 41 F6.1 mJy S0.4 ? Peak 0.4-GHz flux density 43- 46 F4.1 mJy e_S0.4 ? rms uncertainty on flux density 48- 51 F4.2 --- P0.4 ? Envelope attenuation at 0.4-GHz (2) 53- 57 F5.1 mJy S1.4 ? Peak 1.4-GHz flux density 59- 61 F3.1 mJy e_S1.4 ? rms uncertainty on flux density 63- 65 F3.1 --- P1.4 ? Envelope attenuation at 1.4-GHz (2) 68- 71 F4.1 --- Alpha ? Radio spectral index {alpha} (0.4, 1.4 GHz) 74- 98 A25 --- Notes Notes -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notes: (1): measured at 0.4 GHz or, if detected at higher frequency, at 1.4 GHz (2): S0.4 must be multiplied by this factor to recover the apparent flux density S'0.4 with which the source appears on the synthesized map, and hence the signal-to-noise ratio -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Byte-by-byte Description of file: table2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bytes Format Units Label Explanations -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3- 7 F5.1 mJy S0.4(1) Peak 0.4-GHz lower limit for the flux density range 9- 14 F6.1 mJy S0.4(2) Peak 0.4-GHz upper limit for the flux density range 16- 17 I2 --- m1 Number of sources detected in the given flux density range before polar-diagram correction 19- 20 I2 --- m2 Number of sources detected in the given flux density range after polar-diagram correction 23- 27 F5.3 10+5sr-1 DelN Source density 30- 34 F5.3 --- 5C13DelN/No 5C13 Source density (3) 36- 39 F4.2 --- e_5C13DelN/No Error on source density 42- 46 F5.3 --- 5CDelN/No Mean source density (3) for the published 5C surveys (1) 49- 52 F4.2 --- e_5CDelN/No Error on source density 55- 59 F5.3 --- B3DelN/No ? Mean source density (3) for the B3 survey (2) 61- 64 F4.2 --- e_B3DelN/No ? Error on source density -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note (1): Benn and Wall 1995 Note (2): Grueff 1988 Note (3): Normalized to Euclidean integral count 750(S/Jy)^-1.5^/sr References: Benn C.R., Wall J.V. 1995, MNRAS, 272, 678 Grueff G. 1988, A&A, 193, 40 Historical Notes: #A022 in H. Andernach's list; Completed at CDS ========================================================================= (End) James Marcout, Simona Mei [CDS] 16-Aug-1995