Subject headings: galaxies: photometry-quasars: general-radio continuum: galaxies-surveys
This paper is the first in a series aimed at expanding our knowledge of the radio, optical, and infrared properties of a sample of sources selected solely by low-frequency flux density. This survey will be used to address a variety of astrophysical problems. Understanding the high-redshift radio galaxies and the relationship between radio galaxies and radio quasars are two examples of goals for which this program was initiated. Despite the existence of numerous radio surveys at a variety of frequencies, there are at present few complete and unbiased surveys of extragalactic sources for which corresponding optical observations are available. The 178 MHz 3CRR survey (Bennet 1962; Laing et al.1983) is the best-studied sample of strong low-frequency selected sources and is one of the few complete radio samples for which optical identifications and redshift measurements exist for all the sources (see Rawlings et al. 1996 for the last of the 3CRR sources; see Djorgovski et al. 1988 and Spinrad et al. 1985 for the 3CR identifications). At higher frequencies there are several samples that have been fully identified with optical counterparts (e.g., Wall & Peacock 1985). The Parkes Selected Regions (Downes et al. 1986; Dunlop et al. 1989) is a large and completely identified sample selected at 2700 MHz. The redshift content for this sample, however, is fairly meager. Other high-frequency surveys having a high fraction of optical identifications and/or redshifts are confined to strong sources and sample the radio source population with a selection function ...
...
[pages 20-30 not scanned]
...
The r magnitude of each source identification was measured in a series of apertures ranging from 0.5" to 10", and a growth curve was determined. Local sky was determined by computing the median within a 3" wide concentric annulus with an inner radius 4" to 8", the exact location of which was chosen to avoid contamination from nearby stars or galaxies. When nearby objects could not be avoided, they were edited out of the image before the photometry was performed. There are several objects that are too close to foreground stars or galaxies for this procedure to succeed, and their magnitudes are consequently highly uncertain, i.e., +-0.5 mag, and these are noted below. The r magnitudes listed in Table 2 refer to a 4" diameter aperture. For the brightest galaxies the 4" aperture magnitude grossly underestimates the total magnitude.
Figure 1 (Plates 6-28) presents finding charts for nearly all of the radio galaxies. Each image is a 200 x 200 pixel subsection of a larger CCD or infrared camera image with north at the top and east to the left. The radio source identification is positioned at the central pixel in nearly all cases, but for a few objects this was either not possible or desirable. In all cases two vertical and two horizontal ticks mark the identification. For the few sources that remain unidentified, we have indicated the positions of the radio components with circles 5" in diameter. For small doubles we have marked only the midpoint position.
The size of the field displayed depends on the telescope and detector used. Column (12) in Table 2 contains a code number for the field size, which is given in the notes to the table. The vast majority of the images were taken with the 2.5 m/TI CCD combination and so have a field of 66.4"x 66.4" (code 1). Many of the brighter objects were imaged with the 1.0 m and TI CCD and have a field of 87" x 87" (code 2). The infrared images are 70" x 70" (code 3), nearly the same as the 2.5 m/TI CCD images. Several of the bright galaxies were not observed with the 1.0 m telescope, and for these we reproduce 100 x 100 pixel images from the digitized SERC J sky survey films that have been rebinned to 200 x 200 pixel images with a field size of 170" x 170" (code 4). A few images were taken with the 2.5 m plus Tektronix CCD and have a field of 59" x 59" (code 5).
Here we make a few remarks on some objects that have interesting characteristics or for which the finding chart alone may not provide enough information to make the identification clear to the reader. All of the 5 GHz and 1400 MHz data referred to below are presented in Paper II.
0007-287 The central component of this radio source lies within 2" of a
V~15 mag star, as confirmed spectroscopically by R. Hunstead and V.
Kapahi with the Anglo-Australia Telescope (AAT). No other plausible
identification can be seen on our CCD images.
0022-209 There are two sources in our map, both are identified with bright
galaxies in the cluster Abell 27. Only the westernmost of the two sources
is strong enough to remain in the complete sample.
0023-203 This source is 23" south of a bright star. The identification is
confirmed by our K image where the contrast against the scattered light
from the star is better.
0029-232 This is a large source, and the identification is slightly
uncertain. The galaxy marked is ~2" from the symmetry axis of the source.
No other potential identification is visible.
0029-243 The identification consists of two components. The SW component is
close to the midpoint of the radio source and is the correct identification.
0041-224 The 5 GHz VLA map reveals a compact component that is well off
center and slightly north of the symmetry axis of the double source. Our
(poor seeing) CCD images fail to reveal an object at the location of this
component or anywhere else along the source axis. Our K image, however,
does reveal a very red galaxy along the source axis but not coincident with
the compact radio component. We believe that this red galaxy is the correct
identification and that the compact radio component is most likely to be
unrelated. We present both the r and K images for this source to help the
reader identify the field.
0045-255 This source is identified with the starburst galaxy NGC 253; no
chart is included.
0048-233 This source is identified with a bright galaxy that lies only ~10"
north of a bright star. The CCD image was taken through clouds.
0052-241 The identification is quite faint and does not appear clearly in
the chart shown in Figure 1. Strong Ly_alpha emission (see Paper IV) confirms
that this is the correct identification.
0102-256 The identification of this source is uncertain. The radio source
is unresolved, and its position is 2" east of the galaxy marked. The
positional disagreement is larger than the +-1.5" that we used as the
nominal acceptance criterion.
0112-219 This source was not observed with the VLA, and we are unable to
identify it on the basis of the MRC position. We have not included a finding
chart.
0113-245 We are unable to identify the central component of the source in
our 5 GHz maps. CCD images taken with the 2.5 and 1.0 m telescopes fail to
reveal any object at the location of the most plausible candidate for the
central component. The structure of the 5 GHz map suggests a larger source,
and this is reinforced by a 1400 MHz map (see Paper II). It is unclear if
the larger component is related, as no optical counterpart appears near its
midpoint. In Figure 1 we show a sky survey image with the four components
marked. The field of view of this image is 340" x 340"
0115-261 This source is identified with a moderately faint galaxy located
15.5"E and 10.5"N of a much brighter galaxy. This source was incorrectly
identified with the brighter galaxy by Ekers et al. (1989), and thus the
source should not be part of their optical magnitude limited sample.
0122-255 The central component of this triple source
is coincident with the stellar object at the center of the chart
in Figure 1. Spectra obtained by us with the CTIO 4 m
shows this object to be a star. We detect no other potential
identifications for this source.
0127-276 Our 6 cm map reveals a single resolved component located 6"E and
2"S of the marked identification. Long-slit spectra obtained with the CTIO
4 m (Paper IV) reveals strong spatially extended [O III] lambda 5007,4959
emission at the location of the identification and the radio source. We are
confident that we have the correct identification and suspect that we are
missing the western lobe of the source in our map.
0149-260 The identification of this source is uncertain. The 5 GHz map
reveals two sources, the eastern one of which is identified with the galaxy
marked A in Figure 1. The other source could be identified with either of
the two objects marked as B1 and B2, although we believe that B1 is the
most likely identification.
0203-209 There are three faint galaxies near the center of the field shown
in Figure 1. The central galaxy is the identification for the triple source
(see McCarthy et al. 1990).
0211-258 There is a compact group of galaxies near the center of this
double source. We believe that the brightest galaxy in the group is the
correct identification.
0221-285 The identification for this double source is uncertain. The
presence of a star 4"W and 4"S of the midpoint interferes with the
imaging. The faint object marked in Figure 1 lies along the radio axis but
is 3.5" from the midpoint. No other potential identifications are visible in
our deep CCD images.
0226-284 Our 5 GHz maps reveal this to be two sources, both of which are
identified with bright cluster galaxies. The identifications, noted as
0226-284A and 0226-284B, are both shown in Figure 1. Source 0226-284B may
fall below our 408 MHz flux density limit of 950 mJy.
0242-221 This source is not identified on our CCD images, but our deep K
image shows a faint galaxy within 2" of the position of the compact radio
source. The position given in Table 2 is derived from the K image.
0251-273 This narrow-lined galaxy has the highest redshift in our sample
(z=3.16). Our r and narrowband Lye images reveal no significant
structure, and our K images also show the object to be compact.
0255-247 The structure of this source as revealed by our 6 cm map suggests
that we may be seeing only one component of a larger double source. Our CCD
images reveal no potential identification at the location of the radio
component seen in our map.
0256-236 The source is a low surface brightness 46" double, and it was
resolved out in our 5 GHz observations. We do not have a CCD image of this
field, and we are unable to identify the source on the digitized sky
survey.
0259-252A,B We are unable to identify this source or even decide for
certain if it is one or two sources. Our 5 GHz map is quite poor and
suggests either a very large source (size>360") or two sources. Our 1400 MHz
map reveals both components but is ambiguous as to whether it is one or two
sources. We have obtained images at the positions of both components and
near the midpoint with the 1.0 m telescope and fail to find any plausible
candidate identifications for either the one or two source scenarios. We
reproduce a 340" x 340" chart from the digitized sky survey with the two
components marked.
0309-260 The source is a very low surface brightness double, and the
identification is also of very low surface brightness and is not easily
visible in the chart shown in Figure 1.
0312-271 The source is complex and is composed of two or more double
sources. No plausible identifications for various assignments of the
components to two or more sources are seen in our CCD images obtained with
the 1.0 m telescope.
0315-205 The identification for this source is diffuse and barely visible
in the r-band, although it is easily seen at H. We reproduce the r image
here but give the position based on astrometry from the H image.
0316-257 This is the second highest redshift in our sample and the galaxy
has a complex morphology. The western component is the correct
identification for the small double source (see McCarthy et al. 1990).
0327-261 The source is complex and is composed of two or more sources.
0349-278 This is a well-known identification and optical spectra reveal
strong emission lines extended over many arcseconds (e.g., Danziger et al.
1984).
0353-207 We are unable to identify this unresolved steep spectrum source
on our CCD images obtained with the 2.5 m telescope. We do not have a
K-band image.
0357-264 We have not succeeded in identifying this source. The only image
that we have of this field is a 600 s exposure with the 1.0 m telescope.
Deeper imaging is required.
0422-249 The identification for this source is faint and diffuse in the
optical and we do not convincingly detect it in our r image. The
identification is well detected at K, and we reproduce both our r and K
images in Figure 1.
0428-236 This source is not identified on our CCD images obtained with the
1.0 m telescope.
0428-281 The correct identification is the northwesternmost object of the
three at the center of the field.
0431-250 We are unable to identify this triple source on our r-band CCD
images obtained with the 2.5 m telescope.
0436-203 We have no CCD images of this source. For completeness we include
the sky survey chart with the VLA position marked.
0442-289 We have no CCD images of this source, but for completeness we
include the sky survey chart with the VLA position marked.
0457-235 The identification is 4"W and 5"S of the bright star near the
field center. The identification consists of two components, one of which
is coincident with the central component of the radio source, the other
with the NE radio lobe. The NE component is seen more clearly in the g
image than in the r image shown in Figure 1.
0541-288 There are two possible identifications for this source, the
object marked and the object located 4"W and 3"N of the center. Our K
images show the SE object to be redder and is thus more likely the correct
identification.
0543-265 The correct identification is the easternmost object of the pair
at field center.
0551-226 The correct identification is 1.5"E and 0.5"N of a star and is
seen more clearly at K.
0552-249 The correct identification is 1.9"W and 3.3"N of the star near
the field center.
0557-235 The midpoint of this double source is only 4" from a bright star.
We are able to identify it only at K due to the scattered light from the
star at r.
0614-295 We do not have an r image of this source but have identified it
on the basis of a K-band image, shown in Figure 1.
0946-237 Our 5 GHz map reveals two sources, only one of which is strong
enough to remain in the sample. It is identified with the southernmost of
the two objects at the center of the field.
0946-262 The identification for this double source is 1.5"W and 2"N of
the southernmost of the pair of stars near the center of the K image shown
in Figure 1.
0947-217 We are unable to identify this source. Our 5 GHz map is quite
poor and reveals three components, one of which may or may not be part of
the source. Our 1400 MHz map shows the source to be a double. The positions
of these two components are shown on the chart in Figure 1. Neither our r-
nor our K-band images show plausible candidates for the identification.
0947-249 Our 5 GHz map reveals two sources, one of which is strong enough
to remain in the sample; it is identified with a faint galaxy. The
counterpart of the other source is not detected in our CCD image.
0955-283 The correct identification is the northwest component of the
double object at the center of the field.
0958-227 There are two possible identifications for this compact source.
The southeastern of the two objects near the field center is the more
likely one (and is marked) but the northwestern one cannot be ruled out.
1006-286 The northeastern of the two objects at the field center is the
correct identification for this small double source.
1014-278 We are unable to identify this unresolved source in either our
deep r- or K-band images, setting upper limits of r > 24 and K > 19.
1021-217 There is a z=2.4 field galaxy 14" east of the radio source,
marked on the chart with an F.
1023-226 Our 5 GHz map reveals both a double and a compact source. The
double source is identified with the galaxy at the field center. The
compact source is too weak for inclusion in our sample and lies close to a
bright star.
1023-243 This small double source is not identified in our deep r and i
images obtained with the 2.5 m telescope. The identification is, however,
clearly seen in our J. H. and K images. We show the H-band image in Figure 1.
1027-225 There are two plausible identifications for this 16" double source.
Both of the potential identifications are marked with ticks in Figure 1.
1034-265 This source lies 2.4"E and 0.7"S of the apparently stellar object
shown at the center of the chart in Figure 1. Spectroscopy of this object
by Hunstead & Kapahi with the AAT confirms that it is a star. We are unable
to identify the source.
1040-285 The identification is northeast of the star near the center of
the field. We present our J image in Figure 1 since the contrast against
the nearby star is best in this image.
1048-211 We are unable to identify this unresolved source in either our
deep r- or K-band images, setting upper limits of r > 24 and K > 19.
1051-274 There are two possible identifications along the source axis. The
r image shows a faint object along the radio axis, while the K image
reveals a very red object also along the axis, but further from the
midpoint. We show both images in Figure 1 and give the positions for both
the r- and K-based candidate identifications in Table 2. The candidate
K-band identification is marked with a pair of small tick marks in the
center of the chart.
1107-272 We are unable to identify this source in large part because of
the presence of strong scattered light from a bright star south of the
radio position.
1108-212 The identification for this triple source appears to be a galaxy
~15" from a bright star.
1117-217 This double source is identified with a galaxy in our K-band
images. It is not seen in our (low quality) r-band image. Our K image is
shown in the chart in Figure 1.
1132-258 This source was identified with a stellar object. Spectroscopy
with the AAT showed this object to be a star. The positional coincidence
between the radio position and the star is such that we have not attempted
to image this source to seek a fainter identification.
1136-211 The correct identification is the northwesternmost of the three
objects at the center of the field.
1137-257 The identification for this source is uncertain. The object
marked in Figure 1 lies 4" east of the compact radio source.
1138-262 The identification for this bent triple source is highly complex.
The image shown is the sum of several r images for a total of more than
6000 s of integration.
1145-248 There are two possible identifications for this small triple
source. The northern object is closer to the midpoint (and possible core)
of the source, while the southern object is brighter. We suspect that the
northern component is the correct identification, and it is marked on the
chart in Figure 1.
1210-290 Our deep r and i images fail to reveal an identification for this
5" double source. Our K-band images, however, clearly reveal the
identification and a very red companion object. We show both our r and K
images to help the reader recognize the field.
1219-264 The identification of this large triple source is a very diffuse
and low surface brightness galaxy.
1239-256 The identification for this source is faint and diffuse. Figure 1
shows an I-band image; the identification has I = 23.
1245-292 The identification for this source lies 2.5"E and 4"S of the
star near the field center.
1255-282 The identification for this source appears stellar on our images
obtained with the 1.0 m telescope. The source is a 45" double with bright
bridge emission. This source may be a quasar.
1258-211 The potential identifications for this small double consist of
two components aligned east to west and just to the southeast of the star
near field center. Our astrometry places the radio midpoint closer to the
westernmost object, and its redder color also suggests that it is the
correct identification. It is possible, however, that the two optical
components are extranuclear light associated with the alignment effect and
that the nucleus lies between them.
1302-206 This small double source is obscured by a bright foreground galaxy.
1307-217 There are two plausible identifications for this source. The
northern source is brighter and closer to the radio midpoint and possible
central component and is more likely to be the correct identification.
1334-296 This source is identified with NGC 5236; no chart is included.
1343-253 The identification is the bright elliptical south of the field
center.
1351-235 We have not been able to convincingly detect an identification for
this double source, despite repeated efforts in both the visible and
near-infrared. The identification appears to be fainter than r >24, K >19.
2028-223 This source was not observed with the VLA, and we are not able to
identify it on the basis of the MRC (Large et al. 1981) position.
2036-254 The correct identification is a faint galaxy 4" east of a brighter
foreground galaxy seen near the center of the chart in Figure 1.
2039-291 The identification for this double source is uncertain. There is a
faint galaxy detected at both r and K lying 4" north and west of the
midpoint, nominally too far to be considered a secure identification. There
is some low surface brightness radio emission near the faint galaxy so we
consider it as a possible, but unlikely, identification.
2044-272 There is a very faint galaxy at the position of this unresolved
source, and we consider it a tentative identification.
2045-256 This source is identified with a faint galaxy that lies just south
of a bright star. It is too close to the star to allow spectroscopy.
2048-272 The identification for this small double source is not visible
in either our deep r- or I-band images. It is clearly seen in our deep K
image, and optical spectroscopy has confirmed it to be the correct
identification.
2057-286 The correct identification is the southernmost of the two objects
near the field center.
2058-237 The identification is only marginally detected in our r-band CCD
images, but it is well detected at K.
2104-290 This large double source is identified only in our deep K images.
2111-275 Our r image was taken in very poor seeing and the identification
is only marginally visible. We have included a K image which shows the
identification more clearly.
2116-294 We have not been able to identify this large double source. There
are no galaxies brighter than r~22 within 10" of the midpoint.
2123-292 The identification of this double source lies only 35" from a very
bright star and is not easily seen in the chart in Figure 1.
2131-241 The identification is a galaxy 1" northwest of a star visible
at the center of the chart in Figure 1.
2247-232 The identification for this source is quite faint and is not
easily seen in the reproduction of our r image in Figure 1. For clarity we
have also included a K-band image. The radio galaxy is southeastern of the
two galaxies appearing at the meeting of the tick marks in the K image.
2303-253 The identification of this source consists of a chain of galaxies,
the southwesternmost lying closest to the radio core. A 6cm map and larger
optical image of this source is given in McCarthy et al. (1991).
2304-257 We are able to identify this galaxy only at K, even though our r
images are fairly deep. Both the r and K images are shown in Figure 1 to aid
in the recognition of the field.
2314-211 Our 6 cm VLA map shows this to be three sources. which we
designate A,B, and C. We show separate finding charts with the
identifications marked for each source. Sources 2314-211A and 2314-211B
do not belong in the complete sample as their 1410 MHz flux densities imply
that they fall below our 408 MHz flux density limit.
2355-214 The identification for this small double source is the
southwesternmost of the two objects at the center of the field.
Table 2. Optical Positions of MRC / 1 Jy Radio Galaxies IAUname RA_DEC_B1950 pos z rmag Filt FOV Run# rmag2 F2 FOV2 Notes Remarks ----+----1----+----2----+----3----+----4----+----5----+----6----+----7----+----8----+----9 0001-233 000129.13-232339.7 0.097 16.3 r 2 11 0001-237 000114.45-234624.5 0.315 18.7 r 2 11