[ CATS home ] [ Back to CATS list ]
[ ftp ]
Calibration Source List (VLA). Last version 1615 sources
I. CALIBRATING VLA DATA
A. FLUX DENSITY CALIBRATION
1. Flux Density Scale used at the VLA
The flux density scale used at the VLA is based on the flux density and
spectrum of 3C286= 1328+307 (B1950), or 1331+305 (J2000); 3C48= 0134+329
(B1950), or 0137+331 (J2000); and 3C147= 0538+498 (B1950) or 0542+498(J2000).
The flux densities of these sources are based on the work by Baars et al.,
Astron. Astrophys., 61, 99, 1977. The flux density of these sources at a
given frequency is given by the relationship
Log S = A + B * Log v + C * (Log v) ** 2
where S is the flux density in Jy and v is the frequency in MHz. The
parameters for the sources are
Source A B C
3C286 1.480 0.292 -0.124
3C48 2.345 0.071 -0.138
3C147 1.766 0.447 -0.184
NOTE:
The frequency range over which these expressions are valid is 408MHz to
15GHz. Extrapolation of these expressions to 22GHz will result in a
small, but unknown error.
Note that the AIPS program SETJY with OPTYP = 'CALC' will calculate and
insert the relevant flux densities into the database. Do not use
this option if you are switching frequencies within the observing run.
In this case you must calculate and insert the appropriate values for
each frequency and IF with OPTYP = ' '. Note also that the 15OCT89 and
preceding versions of AIPS do not correct the calculated flux densities
for errors in the Baars scale (see next section), nor account for
special variations based on UV restrictions.
2. Adjustment of the Baars Scale to 3C295 and NGC7027
Careful measurements made in the 'D' configuration in 1983, 1985 and
1987 have shown that the flux densities given by Baars et al. are
slightly in error, and that this error is a function of both time and
frequency. We have decided to fix our flux density scale to the Baars
value for 3C295 for P, L, C and X bands, and on the Baars value for
NGC7027 for U and K bands. Observations to determine the correction
factors for 3C48, 3C147 and 3C286 will be made during furture VLA 'D'
configurations.
Below are listed the RATIOS between the true and Baars et al. value for
3C48, 3C286 and 3C147 at the various frequencies for 1987 and 1989. Multiply
the Baars et al. value by this ratio to obtain the correct flux density: Time
variability is small compared to the offsets. See R. Perley if you need more
information.
1987 1989
P L C X U P L C X U
3C48 0.95 1.02 1.04 1.06 1.10
3C147 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.97 1.01 To be determined in Jan. 1990.
3C286 0.95 1.00 1.01 1.01 1.02
3. Accurate Flux Density Bootstrapping
Because of source variability, it is impossible to compile an accurate
listing of flux densities for most calibrators. The values given in Section
II of this manual are only approximate. We strongly recommend bootstrapping
the flux density of a calibrator by comparing the calibrator observations with
one or several observations of 3C286, 3C48 or 3C147.
Careful observations have allowed the following set of rules to be
established for accurate bootstrapping of flux densities using 3C286 or 3C48.
For 3C147, use the rules for 3C48.
3C286 is partially resolved to most combinations of configuration and
band. Its resolution occurs on two different scales - there is a weak
secondary located 2.5" from the core, and the core itself is partially
resolved on longer baselines. Nevertheless, 3C286 can be used as a flux
calibrator for all VLA observations providing the rules laid down below are
followed.
3C48 and 3C147 are heavily resolved to some combinations of
configuration and frequency, but nevertheless can be preferable as a flux
calibrator over 3C286 since they contain no extended structure on scales
greater than 1". Use of 3C48 or 3C147 for flux calibration is preferred over
3C286, providing the former can be used for the array configuration and band
under consideration.
SITUATIONS WHERE 3C48, 3C147 AND 3C286 CAN BE USED DIRECTLY
The following combinations of array configuration and band have no
restrictions in number of antennas or UV range:
3C48/3C147 90cm All configurations
20cm C and D configurations
6cm D configuration
3.6cm D configuration
3C286 90cm B,C,D configurations
20cm C and D configurations
6cm D configuration
2cm D configuration
1.3cm D configuration
SITUATIONS WHERE 3C48 AND 3C147 CANNOT BE USED
The following combinations of configuration and band should not be
calibrated with 3C48 or 3C147.
2cm A configuration
1.3cm A configuration
SITUATIONS WHERE SPECIAL RESTRICTIONS ARE NECESSARY TO ALLOW
FLUX CALIBRATION
The following rules must be carefully followed to ensure proper flux
bootstrapping in the combinations of array scale and band noted below.
NUMBER OF
SOURCE BAND UVRANGE CONFIG INNER ANTENNAS NOTES
(cm) (K) (per arm)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
3C48/3C147 90 0-40 All All
3C48/3C147 20 0-40 A 7
" B,C,D All
3C48/3C147 6 0-40 A 3
" B,C,D All
3C48/3C147 3.6 0-40 A 2
" B 6
" C,D All
3C48/3C147 2 0-40 A 1 Not recommended
" B 4
" C,D All
3C48/3C147 1.3 0-40 A 1 Not recommended
" B 3
" C,D All
NUMBER OF
SOURCE BAND UVRANGE CONFIG INNER ANTENNAS NOTES
(cm) (K) (per arm)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
3C286 90 0-18 A 7
" B,C,D All
3C286 20 0-18 A 4
" B,C,D All
90-180 A All Reduce flux by 6%
3C286 6 0-25 A 1 Not recommended
" B 4
" C,D All
150-300 A All Reduce flux by 2%
3C286 3.6 50-300 A 3 Reduce flux by 1%
50-300 B 7 Reduce flux by 1%
50-300 C All Reduce flux by 1%
0-15 D All
3C286 2 0-150 A 3
" B,C,D All
3C286 1.3 0-185 A 2
" B 7
" C,D All
If these guidelines are followed, the bootstrap accuracy should be 1 or
2 percent at the two lower bands, and perhaps 3 to 5 percent at the upper
bands. At 2cm and 1.3cm bands, other effects, such as dish efficiency,
pointing and atmospheric absorption (1.3cm) are probably more important.
If one were to ignore the guidelines, and blindly calibrate the data on
the basis of the available data, the flux error obtained would vary according
roughly to how much resolution occurs but would not exceed 5% for 3C286. Bear
in mind that there will occur a differential error as well, as the antennas at
the ends of the array will be overcalibrated with respect to those at the
center.
4. Flux Bootstrapping without 3C286, 3C48 or 3C147
If you have not observed 3C48, 3C147 or 3C286 within your run, you can
still accurately bootstrap your fluxes, providing that you have not observed
at K-band. To estimate the calibrator fluxes, use LISTR to print the
calibrator raw data, averaged by scan, in matrix form on the line printer.
There will usually be a discrepant antenna or two - discard these
(temporarily), and average the rest. Multiply by ten to obtain the flux
density, except at P-band, where you multiply by 100. If there are u-v limits
for a calibrator, use them obtaining the listings. If you have observed at a
non-standard frequency, a small adjustment is required to account for the fact
the noise source temperature in each antenna varies with frequency. To
correct for this, multiply you resultant flux by the following factors:
1) L-band 1+(1.3x10-3)(freq-1465) (1400-1670 MHz)
2) C-band 1+(3.3x10-4)(freq-4885) (4500-4950 MHz)
3) U-band No correction needed, 14650-15300 MHz
Due to uncertainties in system behavior, this scheme has not yet been
implemented at P and K bands. The coefficients have not been determined at
X-band.
B. PHASE CALIBRATION USING POSITION CALIBRATORS
The complete list of calibrator sources used at the VLA is given in
Section II. In most programs, calibrator sources are observed at least once
an hour and sometimes as frequently as every 10 minutes. Calibrator
observations are not only important for decreasing instrumental phase and gain
drifts, atmospheric and ionospheric gain and phase variations, but for
monitoring the quality and sensitivity of the data and for spotting the
occasional gain and phase jumps.
1. Choosing a Calibrator
There are several criteria for choosing and using a calibrator. A list
of guidelines, in decreasing order of importance, follows:
- A) Choose the calibrator closest to your source. If it is within 10
deg., atmospheric phase fluctuations will be somewhat better
calibrated. It is better to have one calibrator per source over
the entire run. If several are needed, try to bootstrap their
positions together. However, in the smaller configurations and at
longer wavelengths, these criteria can be considerably relaxed, so
a single calibration for a group of sources is often preferable.
Furthermore, if your target sources can be self-calibrated, the
need for rapid switching between source and calibrator is entirely
removed. Hourly observations of the calibrator are more than
sufficient for this case.
- B) Choose a calibrator which has a P or S quality status for the
desired configuration and frequency. The difference between P and
S is minimal but P is preferred since fewer gain errors will
result.
- C) Different calibrator codes are used only to distinguish the
accuracy of the calibrator position. If absolute positional
accuracy <0.1 arcsec is desired, the position code should be an
important consideration - use 'A' or 'B' calibrators. Note that
all positions for sources with 'A' or 'B' PC codes are taken from
the JPL astrometric list.
- D) The intensity of the calibrator is of secondary importance. The
only exceptions are when the calibrator will be used as a band-pass
calibrator for spectral line observing, and for high dynamic range
observations where closure errors must be measured.
- E) For polarization calibration, it is important to use a strong
calibrator (more than 1 Jy) and to observe it at least 5 times with
a total range in parallactic angle exceeding 90o. Include at least
one observation of 3C138 or 3C286.
2. The J2000 Coordinate System at the VLA
The VLA now supports the J2000 coordinate system. Details on this
implementation are given by Barry Clark in VLA Computer Memorandum 167 of May
11, 1983. The complete description of the J2000 coordinate system can be
found in the USNO circular 163 edited by G. H. Kaplan of the Naval Research
Laboratory. In summary, positions given in epoch 2000 will be precessed in
accordance with the recommendations of USNO 163. Positions given in epoch
1950 will employ adjustments, so that they are effectively processed by the
recommendations of the Explanatory Supplement of 1960. Positions of any other
epoch will, currently, be precessed by the recommendations of the Explanatory
Supplement of 1960. The most serious consequence of this is that planetary
coordinates given in apparent coordinates of observing date are assumed to be
in the system of the FK4. It seems likely that as soon as the system of FK5
comes into greater use for the production of planetary ephemerides, we shall
reverse this decision, and use the FK5 and the formulae of USNO 163 for epochs
other than 1950.
It now seems profitable for anyone interested in the highest positional
accuracy to use J2000 coordinates for all future observations, unless
compatibility with previous observations is critical and the whole series does
not span enough time to be unduly confused by the known error in Newcomb's
precession constant. (It is probably less work to put previous observations
in J2000 coordinates that to calculate the corrections to the 1950 coordinates
of various dates, if the observations span more than a couple of years). For
the general VLA user, the pressure to change systems is not so strong--he must
consider whether it is more important that his observation remain compatible
with previous observations of the object, or whether it should be compatible
with future accurate astrometry, either radio or optical. We do not recommend
changing to J2000 coordinates for an object which you have observed here
before, and might conceivably wish to combine the old (u,v) data--there is no
point in just asking for trouble. However, we encourage the use of J2000
coordinates for new observations unless there is a firm argument against doing
so. It seems inevitable that J2000 coordinates are going to come into general
use, and the sooner we can get through the painful transition period, the
better off we all shall be.
III. VLA CALIBRATORS
Description of the Table
The following table lists all of the sources which have been found to
be suitable calibrators for the VLA. The quality of some calibrators
varies with frequency and configuration and the table includes comments
pertaining to this. Several examples from the table are given below:
NAME EPOCH PC RA DEC
0038-213 2000.0 C 00 38 29.9524 -21 20 04.027
0036-216 1950.0 C 00 36 00.4390 -21 36 33.100
BAND FLUX A B C D UVmin UVmax
-----------------------------------------------------
20cm L 0.78 ? ? X X 10
6cm C 0.34 S S S S 200
3.6cm X 0.22 X S S S 200
NAME EPOCH PC RA DEC
0714+146 2000.0 T 07 14 04.6352 +14 36 20.629
0711+146 1950.0 T 07 11 14.3000 +14 41 33.000
Also known as 3C175.1
BAND FLUX A B C D UVmin UVmax
-----------------------------------------------------
90cm P 6 X S S X 1 4
20cm L 1.90 X X X S 4
NAME EPOCH PC RA DEC
1733-130 2000.0 A 17 33 02.7058 -13 04 49.546
1730-130 1950.0 A 17 30 13.5352 -13 02 45.837
BAND FLUX A B C D UVmin UVmax
-----------------------------------------------------
20cm L 5.20 S X X P 40 3
6cm C 5.00 P P P P
3.6cm X 5.80 P P P P
2cm U 3.70 P P P P
NAME EPOCH PC RA DEC
1759+237 2000.0 C 17 59 00.3527 +23 43 46.974
1756+237 1950.0 C 17 56 55.9320 +23 43 55.800
BAND FLUX A B C D UVmin UVmax
-----------------------------------------------------
20cm L 0.70 S S S X 6 90
6cm C 1.00 X S S S 90
3.6cm X 0.55 S S S S
2cm U 0.00 ? ? ? ?
TABLE HEADER
Line 1: Source IAU name at epoch (2000). Use
of this name in OBSERVE fetches RA
and DEC at epoch 2000.
PC = Position Code for coordinate accuracy.
Line 2: Source IAU name at epoch (1950). Use
of this name in OBSERVE fetches RA
and DEC at epoch 1950.
Line 3: (Optional)-Other common names for the
source. Desired epoch must be
explicitly specified in OBSERVE.
(The Dec. 1989 release of OBSERVE
does not recognize this alias name).
Position codes are:
A = positional accuracy <0.002 arcseconds
B = positional accuracy 0.002 - 0.01 arcseconds
C = positional accuracy 0.01 - 0.15 arcseconds
T = positional accuracy >0.15 arcseconds
Note: Errors in declination increase in the south, except for A
and B calibrators.
TABLE FORMAT
Col 1 & 2: Band and Band code. For 1.3cm use 2cm entry.
Col 3: Flux = The approximate flux density of the source.
Use only as an indicator of the source strength.
Col 4-7: Calibrator quality in the A, B, C and D configuration
P = <3% amplitude closure errors expected
S = 3-10% closure errors expected
X = Do not use. Too much resolution or too weak
? = Not observed
Col 8 & 9: Antsol restrictions. These are suggested UVLIMITS in
K to use in CALIB to avoid data which are
contaminated by structure. A UVMIN (Col. 8) generally
means the source is confused at short spacings. A
UVMAX (Col. 9) generally means the source is resolved
at long spacings.
Particular comments on the above examples are:
- 1. Although '?' appears in the table for 0038-213 it is likely that the
source is a fine calibrator at 20cm in the A and B configurations since
it is unresolved at 6 and 3.6cm at similar resolutions. It is listed
with a '?' because we have not confirmed its suitability. Many '?' entries
can be interpreted in this way.
- 2. The X at 20cm C and D configurations for 0038-213 and the UVMIN
means that the source is confused at short spacings at 20cm. The
source could be used, but gain quality would be poorer.
- 3. The source 0714+146 is only a calibrator at 20cm in the D
configuration and in B and C configurations at 90cm. Many
similarly extended sources are included in the listings. Most are
fairly strong and can be used as bandpass calibrators at 20cm.
- 4. The inaccurate position (PC-T) of 0714+146 is not a restriction
for 20cm D configuration observing.
- 5. Notice that 0714+146 can be called with the alias 3C175.1. Only
the most famous sources have entries under pseudonyms which are
restricted to 3C names. We are trying to stick with the IAU
designation names as much as possible.
- 6. Note the apparent conflict in UVLIMITS for 1733-130 at 20cm. This
conflict is resolved by noting that two different ranges will
allow a valid CALIB solution; the first, valid for the D array, is
0 to 3 k wavelengths; the second, valid for the A array, is 40 k
wavelengths to the longest baseline (approximately 180 k wavelengths).
- 7. The 2cm listing for 1759+237 has zero flux density and '?' for
quality, indicating it has not been observed. Because the source
shows a flat spectrum, it is likely to be a good calibrator at 2cm.